DocServer

Criteria for the Complexity of Successive Astronomical Paradigms

Papaspirou, Panagiotis and Karamanos, Kostas and Moussas, Xenophon (2014) Criteria for the Complexity of Successive Astronomical Paradigms. Physics International, 5 (1). pp. 92-102.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (362Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    We investigate the complexity of three successive astronomical paradigms in the science of Physics, namely the Ptole- maic paradigm, the Copernican paradigm, and the Keplerian paradigm, and mention briefly some characteristic facts about the colossal Newtonian paradigm. This complexity can be understood according to five criteria, as proposed by Thomas Kuhn, the father of the epistemological notion of the paradigm, as well as the founder of an important episte- mological school within the realm of the 20 th century. We propose that there does not exists an overall formal criterion for deciding among these rival paradigms, that is of the existing astronomical paradigms at the age Johannes Kepler formulated its own breakthrough within the science of Astronomy. The further evolution of the science of Astronomy, as well as the advent of the telescope era for investigating the celestial phenomena surely decided for the Newtonian paradigm, which can be understood as the epitome of all past astronomical and cosmological paradigms, yet the ad- vance of the scientific study of the celestial phenomena did not evolved within a linear fashion, on the other hand, it has undergone many changes, subject to the great historical turns, that is the eras of the mentioned astronomical paradigms, during their evolution and their abandonment from the scientific community of the astronomers, the scholars and the polymaths of their age, respectively. We propose that each of Thomas Kuhn criteria imposes its own “complexity measure” of these paradigms, while the overall complexity criterion has to be regarded as the accumulating , over- whelming, empirical evidence, for finally deciding the new way of evolution and the novel turn within the science of Astronomy, especially in the post-Keplerian, and surely in the post-Newtonian era.

    Item Type: Article
    Subjects: 84-xx Astronomy and astrophysics
    Faculty: UNSPECIFIED
    Depositing User: Dr David Allingham
    Date Deposited: 13 Jan 2014 10:06
    Last Modified: 05 May 2014 16:44
    URI: https://docserver.carma.newcastle.edu.au/id/eprint/1488

    Actions (login required)

    View Item